From 022628d2487750876835aff908f717e4a50a7a16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: pascal Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:44:32 +0000 Subject: U22A5 statt downtack für ⊥ Klärungsbedarf: warum hier kein keysym? Möglicherweise wegen ungewöhnlicher Bezeichnung, da ⊥ eigentlich uptack sein sollte? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit git-svn-id: https://svn.neo-layout.org@2213 b9310e46-f624-0410-8ea1-cfbb3a30dc96 --- linux/xmodmap/neo_de.xmodmap | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'linux') diff --git a/linux/xmodmap/neo_de.xmodmap b/linux/xmodmap/neo_de.xmodmap index 827f915..5c3b42f 100644 --- a/linux/xmodmap/neo_de.xmodmap +++ b/linux/xmodmap/neo_de.xmodmap @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ keycode 11 = 2 section twosuperior twosubscript masculine NoSymbol logicalor ! § ² ₂ º ∨ keycode 12 = 3 U2113 threesuperior threesubscript numerosign NoSymbol logicaland NoSymbol ! ℓ liter ³ ₃ № ∧ -keycode 13 = 4 guillemotright U203A femalesymbol NoSymbol NoSymbol downtack NoSymbol +keycode 13 = 4 guillemotright U203A femalesymbol NoSymbol NoSymbol U22A5 NoSymbol ! » › ♀ ⊥ perpendicular keycode 14 = 5 guillemotleft U2039 malesymbol periodcentered NoSymbol U2221 NoSymbol ! « ‹ ♂ · ∡ angle sign -- cgit v1.2.3